SMALL BY DESIGN Every student gets our full attention. Read our story →
← Explore undergraduate journeys

E.B.’S UNDERGRADUATE JOURNEY

E.B.’s repair work revealed how he learned and collaborated.

He could explain how a mechanism worked. Together, we helped his application show how he handled uncertainty, listened to others, and took responsibility.

His starting point
A first-generation applicant at a California public high school
His academic interests
Mechanical engineering, energy systems, and applied mathematics

An anonymized student journey, shared with initials.

Illustration of a student working beside a bicycle in a workshop
AI-generated illustration, not a photograph of E.B.

E.B.’S OFFERS

  • Harvard University
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Stanford University
  • Cornell University

He chose MIT after comparing financial aid and hands-on engineering culture.

Explore his decision
His other application outcomes

Rejected by California Institute of Technology; waitlisted at Princeton University.

THE MATERIAL WAS ALREADY THERE

Everyday responsibilities deserved space beside his technical achievements.

E.B. had strong mathematics and physics results, but his activity list buried paid work under robotics jargon. He had more to share than the first draft revealed.

HOW WE HELPED

We mapped where he had made, tested, repaired, and taught. Then we helped him describe his own contribution, with detail he could stand behind.

Bicycle repairs made room for trial and error.

Years of repairing bicycles with his uncle gave him practical problems to investigate.

Paid work made communication matter.

At an auto-parts store, he explained problems to customers who used different names for the same component.

Robotics challenged how he worked with others.

Fixing a mechanism alone was not enough if his teammates could not understand the repair.

INSIDE THE ESSAY

A failed repair helped him show how he thinks.

His main essay followed a repair that kept failing. He used the experience to explain how he reconsidered a problem.

THE FIRST EXPLANATION

He focused on the visible problem.

The repair kept failing, leaving him with a question his first diagnosis could not answer.

THE RECONSIDERATION

He looked at the underlying load.

He began to understand why treating the visible problem had not addressed its cause.

THE PERSONAL STORY

He explained what changed in his thinking.

The essay made his persistence and willingness to revise a diagnosis easier to understand.

LETRADO’S ROLE

We asked him to make the reasoning clear to a reader who was not an engineer. E.B. wrote the responses, and we checked the technical details with him.

THE WORK BEYOND ONE ESSAY

His application needed to show a collaborator as well as a maker.

A teammate helped E.B. see that repairing alone left others unable to understand the fix. He began documenting his work so the team could follow it.

His contribution became easier to understand.

We helped him distinguish his contribution from the robotics team’s results and explain collaborative setbacks in ordinary language.

Recommendations and interviews

A recommendation plan helped teachers discuss both technical ability and growth as a communicator. Interview practice gave him space to explain the setbacks, not just the finished result.

School research gave each answer a purpose.

He compared project culture, first-year flexibility, research opportunities, and energy-related coursework instead of reusing one engineering paragraph.

Research and supplemental writing

We helped connect those educational differences to his interests. The question was what he wanted to learn and how that university could support it.

Actual aid shaped the family’s comparison.

We tracked aid forms and deadlines separately from application tasks, then helped the family compare the actual offers.

Planning with his family

E.B. helped translate aid instructions for his parents and chose how much family context to share. The decision stayed open until the family could compare real financial terms.

MIT’s Great Dome and stone-columned facade
MIT · Marco Almbauer, public domain

HIS FINAL CHOICE

Hands-on learning and the final aid comparison led him to MIT.

At first, E.B. expected to favor a familiar West Coast option. He kept an open mind as he learned more about the education and his family’s actual cost.

The way he wanted to learnHands-on engineering culture matched his interest in making, testing, and repairing.

The cost his family would payThe final financial-aid comparison mattered more than the published price alone.

Compare undergraduate study options

IDEAS FOR YOUR OWN APPLICATION

Your everyday responsibilities may reveal more than you think.

You do not need E.B.’s interests to use these questions. Start with experiences you can describe honestly and in detail.

What do people rely on you for?

Include paid work, family responsibilities, and regular commitments when you consider what belongs in your activities.

When did your first explanation fall short?

Choose a specific moment. Explain what you noticed, what you reconsidered, and what you learned.

Can someone else follow your contribution?

Make your role within a team clear. Ask a non-specialist whether they can understand your reasoning.

Bring the questions you are still working through.

Meet your proposed mentor in a free 45-minute introduction. We’ll talk about what would help and send a personalized plan by email afterward.

← Read another undergraduate journey